They’re not arguments, they’re factual statements about how the various presidents of the eu get to be president of the institution they’re head of. This is not anti eu propaganda, it’s all information available on the eu’s own website.
You say you can’t be bothered to point out where I’m wrong. The truth is that you can’t refute what I’m saying because it’s factually accurate. So you resort to the utterly puerile “he’s anti-eu, therefore he’s brainwashed/racist/evil” bullshit, and completely avoid the issues being discussed. Utterly pathetic.
(, Thu 7 Jan 2021, 16:58, Reply)
The truth is I'm bored of this bendy bananas level of wrongness that you keep spouting.
Your rhetorical style is how fascists grind down their opposition, you make a false claim, then defend it with 16 more false claims, and defend each of those with yet more false claims, until there's just too much bullshit to wade through and the original point is forgotten. Those wise enough to walk away appear to concede.
It is an accurate and true statement of fact that the EU elects its institutional presidents. You agree. I'm happy. Good day to you.
(, Thu 7 Jan 2021, 17:55, Reply)
You even conceded that the ‘election’ of the president of the commission, arguably the most powerful individual vis à vis international trade, is unsatisfactory. All these elections are a travesty of democracy, and you know it.
(, Fri 8 Jan 2021, 1:24, Reply)
The subjects of the UK have no democratic way to select who represents them in our 2nd house. The subjects of the UK have no way of choosing their head of state, because God appoints our head of state through birth into a German aristocracy.
If you hate the anti-democratic elements of European bureaucracy, surely you must hate the aristocracy and especially the British monarchy, right?
We should campaign for a British republic together.
(, Fri 8 Jan 2021, 15:01, Reply)