The real solution is for people
to stop having children when they already cannot feed themselves. No amount of money will ever make that happen.
How about you level the same charge at the Catholic Church, which likely has considerably more money than Elon Musk, has an established network of outlets already positioned to help communities around the world, claims to be all about pastoral care while tithing the shit out of people, and which actively campaigns to ensure poor people make as many more poor people as they possibly can?
I'd say they're a much better candidate, in terms of capacity to help, in terms of self-proclaimed responsibility, and in terms of actual culpability.
(, Thu 4 Mar 2021, 10:45, Reply)
Elon Musk can't guarantee everlasting life though, the ultimate insurance scam.
(
FeralCatMan Long ads need comments sections, Thu 4 Mar 2021, 14:30,
Reply)
Stop the poor breeding. Got it.
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Thu 4 Mar 2021, 15:27,
Reply)
The negative influences of churches vastly outweighs the benefits.
Don't get me started on that. Or do, if you want. But I will rant.
I'm a bit to the right of Dawkins.
Religion is the root of all evil. Belief makes no sense whatsoever, and is the antithesis of science. Religion keeps society back in the dark ages, of witchcraft and magic. Teaching religion to childen is child abuse.
Catholics are exactly the same as flat-Earthers, and should be treated as such. There is no evidence of a God, like there is no evidence that the world is flat.
Flat Earth is relatively harmless, because very few people believe in it. But religion is incredibly harmfull, because billions of religious people get to vote, and that's scary. If someone believed that Santa Claus was real, you probably wouldn't want them to be allowed to vote on the science budget. But for some bizarre reason, if people believe in Jehovah or Allah, it is deemed acceptable. I do not understand why.
(, Thu 4 Mar 2021, 16:46, Reply)