b3ta.com links
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 1567149 | Random (Thread)

This is a normal post oh, the wit
and the tiresome Prufock cycle is almost complete.
1) attempts to troll me compelled by hatred
2) retreats to grammatical pedantry in attempt to save face. What was it last week? I left a full stop off my comment. That was a great save...
3) trolling somehow becomes even more nakedly humourless, a feat in itself, and insulting, often regurgitated trolling catchphrases I haven't seen since the 90s
which only leaves us with your last ditch stand
4) calling me mad or insane
and so it goes...

and there you have it. never any argument over ideas, like whether my predictions about the icelandic volcano had merit, you're not really capable of that. even your brief attempt to defend the spectator made me feel like I was arguing with some distressed inarticulate teen rather than an adult.It's just a tedious cycle you'll try again next week, but I guess any attention is good attention, when you have so little else going by way of personality or substance
(, Tue 8 Jun 2021, 14:23, , Reply)
This is a normal post When you two shag it's going to be EXPLOSIVE!

(, Tue 8 Jun 2021, 16:33, , Reply)
This is a normal post {XD

(, Tue 8 Jun 2021, 21:33, , Reply)
This is a normal post Liquid hot magma and ejecta all over the place.

(, Tue 8 Jun 2021, 22:02, , Reply)
This is a normal post boomkaki

(, Wed 9 Jun 2021, 3:09, , Reply)
This is a normal post Says the guy who went mental about an article he didn’t read about a show he didn’t watch.
You can say that’s sane if you like, but it ain’t.
(, Wed 9 Jun 2021, 0:22, , Reply)
This is a normal post just because you're unable to follow an argument, it doesn't imply the other person is mental, though I'm sure it's comforting to believe so
if the spectator run a poor review of coogan, and I point out that it's in line with the attack pieces they've been running on coogan since he gave evidence at leveson, and indicative of the falling standards of their writing (and I provided a few links to illustrate my point), then that's relevant. It's just your mind being unable to switch gears, prufock, possibly hampered by how personally invested in the spectator you are. you thought people would just pile in like the spectator readers' comments, but found yourself in an argument about the mag itself and were unable to articulate anything other than "please don't talk about this" and call me mental. it's about as satisfying as our other exchanges, but like above, still you persist.
(, Wed 9 Jun 2021, 2:15, , Reply)
This is a normal post You didn’t read the article or watch the show, so how, exactly and precisely, were you following the argument?

(, Wed 9 Jun 2021, 8:01, , Reply)