10-20%?
The margin for error is 200% on the lower estimate? That sounds like numbers being picked out of the air, it does not sound very scientific at all.
(
Prufrock Lucifer, son of the morning!, Tue 13 Jul 2021, 10:56,
Reply)
That's not an estimate range.
In the article itself, you'll find that 20 % is the number of people with symptoms 5 weeks after recovering from acute covid, and 10 % is the number of people with symptoms 12 weeks after their acute infection.
"Not very scientific at all"? This is the fucking Lancet Respiratory Medicine journal right?
You're telling me to follow the science and you can't be bothered to read the material?
(
Invisible Wizard - 13th Level Scrote, Tue 13 Jul 2021, 15:08,
Reply)
