I'm using "evil" here because I see the anti-trans position as fundamentally a human rights issue
Just as I would call anti-Semitism, or white supremacy evil.
But don't get me wrong - I don't believe that anti-trans people are evil in themselves. Evil is an activity, not a state.
I like your point about non-rational positions, but it's a bit depressing, and I'll not give up just because it seems difficult.
( , Sat 14 Aug 2021, 12:50, Reply)
Just as I would call anti-Semitism, or white supremacy evil.
But don't get me wrong - I don't believe that anti-trans people are evil in themselves. Evil is an activity, not a state.
I like your point about non-rational positions, but it's a bit depressing, and I'll not give up just because it seems difficult.
( , Sat 14 Aug 2021, 12:50, Reply)
Keep at it.
Bigots need to be told they're bigots. They can't work it out for themselves.
( , Sat 14 Aug 2021, 14:08, Reply)
Bigots need to be told they're bigots. They can't work it out for themselves.
( , Sat 14 Aug 2021, 14:08, Reply)
have you ever considered the possibility that you might be wrong in some of your assertions?
rather than to what degree of evilness those who disagree with you possess. you probably think you're on the side of right because you're well-intentioned and empathetic to this one group, but plenty of people have done awful things throughout history believing themselves similar.
There's plenty of examples of competing rights in this world, and few without consequence. The rights of walkers to free access to trails can compete with rights of motorbike riders and the rights of landholders. The right to assert a change of identity under law can compete with the rights of women to have segregated and safe spaces, the rights of prisoners, the rights of other citizens to assert their own interpretation and labelling of the gender of someone they interact with, the rights of sports competitors. Your "everyone who doesn't agree to all the rights asserted by this one group is evil, because I know the truth" sounds a terribly intolerant starting point to me in a complex issue
( , Sun 15 Aug 2021, 1:11, Reply)
rather than to what degree of evilness those who disagree with you possess. you probably think you're on the side of right because you're well-intentioned and empathetic to this one group, but plenty of people have done awful things throughout history believing themselves similar.
There's plenty of examples of competing rights in this world, and few without consequence. The rights of walkers to free access to trails can compete with rights of motorbike riders and the rights of landholders. The right to assert a change of identity under law can compete with the rights of women to have segregated and safe spaces, the rights of prisoners, the rights of other citizens to assert their own interpretation and labelling of the gender of someone they interact with, the rights of sports competitors. Your "everyone who doesn't agree to all the rights asserted by this one group is evil, because I know the truth" sounds a terribly intolerant starting point to me in a complex issue
( , Sun 15 Aug 2021, 1:11, Reply)