(, Sun 12 Sep 2021, 19:55, Reply)
Obviously millions of books are pulped or burned ever year, but racist ones are especially precious.
(, Sun 12 Sep 2021, 20:18, Reply)
...it is usually on the pretext that the contents are dangerous.
The way to ensure that ideas, thoughts, opinions aren’t destroyed by those who want to silence them isn’t to say “we’ll only burn bad books”, it’s by saying “burning books is never a thing to be celebrated”
Critique a racist book. Analyse it, annotate it, say something insightful about its content. It’s bizarre that people don’t grasp this
(, Mon 13 Sep 2021, 8:05, Reply)
Eliminating history or texts usually occurs when you want to replace it with a new narrative that suits your cause. It's never for good reasons.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2021, 11:51, Reply)
- like they do for old films with dodgier content than we'd comfortably tolerate these days?
On a related note, isn't it curious that we have widespread state film censorship, but it's far less common to see literary censorship.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2021, 19:14, Reply)
I suspect that the vast majority of folk denouncing her for her 'racist' and 'ableist' overtones likely had no intention of reading her book in the first place.
People make a hobby of finding things to get morally outraged by these days. Instead of bowing to their demands of inoffensive vaguery, why not grow a fucking backbone and tell them to shit off, instead?
(, Mon 13 Sep 2021, 22:51, Reply)
It's not like she was legally obliged to make cuts or anything.
(, Tue 14 Sep 2021, 6:56, Reply)