(, Mon 11 Oct 2021, 20:26, Reply)
but then again, that would deny torygraph readers the feelings of outrage at yet another "broken britain" story that they are constantly seeking out
(, Tue 12 Oct 2021, 3:58, Reply)
Who just happened to down a few vodka's after smashing into another motorist, whilst the magistrates thought her account was "often confused and misleading". The bint is clearly a danger to the public.
You keep bringing the evil tories into anything not related to politics. Is your arse still sore from being fucked over by Corbyn?
(, Tue 12 Oct 2021, 17:08, Reply)
but essentially it's a failed prosecution following a car accident that none of us witnessed or heard the evidence presented, but seems to get many in a huge tizz with some angry certainty that an injustice has been done. That's why they print these pointless stories, because people like getting impotently outraged. If there's comments, all the better, so it can be some shared outpouring of bile. Personally I think papers like this play their readers like fiddles. There's really no other interest here. If the police want to charge someone with drink driving they need to arrive on the scene early enough to establish they're drunk behind the wheel, or have some other evidence. Unless you're suggesting we do away with the presumption of innocence that underpins the british legal system since medieval times to satisfy your uninformed sanctimony, I don't know what the fuck you're on about
(, Tue 12 Oct 2021, 22:41, Reply)
I crashed my car the other day and drank half a bottle of vodka while waiting for the aa to turn up.... probably was a bad idea but would have been telling the truth if the rozzers had got involved. Was very annoyed and not thinking it through.
(, Mon 11 Oct 2021, 20:54, Reply)
"Two pints containing vodka" is a long way from "two pints of vodka". However, she's clearly a danger to everyone around her. She got off on a technicality, and justice certainly hasn't been done.
(, Mon 11 Oct 2021, 22:03, Reply)
Two sides to the coin:
First side is a clever legally astute and aware one.
The other is a drunken tart who can afford the other side of the coin or the pater is.
Case law should now close this gap really as this is a Scott free out for any reckless idiot tbh.
(, Mon 11 Oct 2021, 23:10, Reply)
Wouldn't be surprising if the firm she works for has some kind of legal representation that advised her on the situation. Total fucking joke.
That said, if she's the type to get behind the wheel with her kids in the car after she's had a few, she's already on the alcoholism train, so this wont be her last offense.
(, Tue 12 Oct 2021, 8:01, Reply)
According to the comments in the Manchester Evening News, she has a bit of a reputation for this kind of thing - unsurprisingly. And there's no chance she's getting off with that excuse a second time.
(, Tue 12 Oct 2021, 8:02, Reply)
The standard for criminal conviction is “beyond reasonable doubt”. She went out of her way to provide that doubt.
Pretty sure they’ll go out of their way to see her bang to rights if there is a next time.
(, Tue 12 Oct 2021, 11:45, Reply)
It's the only way out of this mess.
(, Tue 12 Oct 2021, 13:22, Reply)
She'll get pulled over for some reason or other.
(, Tue 12 Oct 2021, 16:54, Reply)
