What's worse - objectifying of cisgender women on /links, or the usual transphobic bigotry on /links?
YOU DECIDE.
(, Tue 30 May 2023, 11:10, Reply)
Unlike what HR managers across the world would have you believe
Sex, to desire or be desired, is one of the fundamental motivational impulses of human behaviour. Rather than being automatically wrong and offensive and objectifying to reference, it’s those that can articulate and acknowledge it directly that are generally the ones that have relationships.
Toyah has great tits, as a self-evident observation, and goes to a fair bit of artifice in order to flash them on a weekly basis. I reckon she’d be far more likely to appreciate an honest compliment than feel offended by it
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Wed 31 May 2023, 0:35,
Reply)
Don't mind Tony.
He's just being a chippy little twat. He enjoys shifting the focus away from his own repressed issues by pointing out how absolutely terrible everybody else is.
(, Wed 31 May 2023, 13:34, Reply)
he's fine
more an opportunity to trot out some nebulous counterargument of my own.
the pivot to being offended about tits is funny, though, on a board that currently has a a bunch of cocks on the main board.
As to female boarders, I don't think it was the puerile nature that scared a lot of them off, it's always been that way, and is much milder now because there's less people. My recollection was it was more the creepy whiteknighters who treated any woman they identified as some unicorn princess to be fawned over, instead of just a normal boarder wanting to join in. Everything they posted got gushing compliments and needy attempts at personal intimacy. Probably got a bit much for many of them.
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Thu 1 Jun 2023, 3:21,
Reply)