I think they refer to them as controlled opposition. It's like a network of people not linked to each other but with a common goal. To keep you engaged with the bullshit and at each other’s throats.
The algorithm thinks I'm a righty but is confused because I used to like Stewart Lee. :D
(, Fri 13 Feb 2026, 11:36, Reply)
Then everyone else
(, Fri 13 Feb 2026, 13:32, Reply)
- much more helpful to map a series of policy points onto a transcendental hyperbole matrix and express the result as a 21-digit hexadecimal string.
(, Fri 13 Feb 2026, 15:09, Reply)
and 99% of the results were right wing sources decrying left wing politics. Australian Fox News, American Fox News, countless bearded gammons shouting in cars, and the sort of PCT pseudo documentary shite that swank links to here.
I wonder if you get similar results?
(, Fri 13 Feb 2026, 16:52, Reply)
- but it didnt make any less sense
(, Fri 13 Feb 2026, 18:06, Reply)
Please try to describe who 'they' are and who 'them' are. It might help to reveal meaning in the rest of your statement.
(, Fri 13 Feb 2026, 16:47, Reply)
general they/thems... no one in particular. slow down and stop overthinking.
(, Fri 13 Feb 2026, 20:43, Reply)
you think no one in particular refers to no one in particular as controlled opposition.
But this presents as a contrary argument to whatever vaguely paranoid point you seemed to be making originally.
It reads as nonsense, and your explanation seeks to obscure meaning.
Like I said, you're going to find it hard to define your NWO figures when pressed.
If you had intellectual honesty and the courage of your convictions you could easily just come out and say it.
Don't let fear define you.
(, Fri 13 Feb 2026, 21:23, Reply)
Given that youtube decides what you are fed, for their own engagement ratings and profit, "they" are youtube.
(, Sun 15 Feb 2026, 8:17, Reply)
(, Sun 15 Feb 2026, 18:42, Reply)