Hmm yes, it's to protect the children.
I don't think you realise the full implications of this.
Blogs/sites critical of the government - gone
Independent news sites - gone
Midget-horse-fisting - toned down.
(
(|D[ekionplexis B3ta.com: fictional child porn is OK, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 13:04,
Reply)
You may have to opt-in to access it.
Or, it'll still be up, but you'll only be allowed to post pictures of cats with amusing phrases underneath them.
Which is a good thing, everyone loves cats..and fisting.
(
(|D[ekionplexis B3ta.com: fictional child porn is OK, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 13:11,
Reply)
hang on a sec.
who mentioned blogs being removed? you seriously think the government of any developed country would sneakily just start chopping sites off the internet that it didn't agree with?
(
Just Flange, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 13:14,
Reply)
Read the entire article.
- In December 2006, Republican Senator John McCain tabled a proposal to introduce legislation that would fine blogs up to $300,000 for offensive statements, photos and videos posted by visitors on comment boards. It is well known that McCain has a distaste for his blogosphere critics, causing a definite conflict of interest where any proposal to restrict blogs on his part is concerned.
(
(|D[ekionplexis B3ta.com: fictional child porn is OK, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 13:16,
Reply)
