I have never,
ever, in ten years of being online, EVER seen any child pornography. Ever.
Which makes me think it's not the kind of thing you can stumble upon just by accident - I'd imagine that paedos share images with each other via p2p or something.
And why exactly is a site on euthanasia "horrible and unsuitable"? Because it upsets you?
(
somegreybloke, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 13:23,
Reply)
look, everyone seems to be going against my point here and picking small hole in my phrasing.
euthanasia is horrible and unsuitable only on the grounds that its illegal.
i have no problem with it.
i simply think that everyones fucking panic over a tiny bit of regulation is extreme to say the least.
the govenrment have said nothing about censoring political opinion, only about sites that are unsuitable (i don't know about you guys but i take that to mean sites that actually break laws within that countries boundaries)
i can't be fucked to talk further on this cos i'm obviously not in with the popular opinion and as such i'll just get pulled apart on everything i say.
(
Just Flange, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 13:28,
Reply)
the act of euthanasia is illegal in australia
but information about it surely can't be?
and that's the real problem here.
there's a BIG difference between an illegal act and information about it, however unsuitable some people think that information may be.
(
The little pink animal is mostly harmless, except on, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 13:34,
Reply)
sadly
hang around 4chan /b board long enough.....
just one of the reasons I don't go there anymore
(
The little pink animal is mostly harmless, except on, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 13:39,
Reply)
