Ridiculously higher than high-end audio equipment
(, Wed 12 Nov 2008, 20:25, Reply)
But even the most major labels won't have half of that stuff, or need it...some of it is taking noise/resonance reduction to the nearly obsessive extreme.
(, Wed 12 Nov 2008, 20:30, Reply)
I wonder what it sounds like though when it's all done proper? Prettttty gooooood i'd say
(, Wed 12 Nov 2008, 20:45, Reply)
www.synergisticresearch.com/?p=195
^Excessively expensive Buddhist themed bass and vibrational satellite reflection cups that are strategically placed around one's room.
(, Wed 12 Nov 2008, 21:08, Reply)
would "demagnetizing a CD" improve quality? That's utter toosh, it's a digital format, it either gets played or it doesn't if the drive has problems reading the data you soon know about it.
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 8:48, Reply)
who buys anything from either of those websited deserves to be comprehensively ripped off for thinking about boobs instead of concentrating in GCSE Science. Demagnetizing an LP? wtf?
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 9:12, Reply)
www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/ampins/ampins.htm
checkout pseudo science in audio for something more sensible
my flabber gets ghasted by this sort of Crystal healing shite.
It can`t work in this universe, maybe in another less rigorous one?
I thought the trades descriptions act applied to snake oil adverts too. which is why you don`t see them.
Edit I forgot "silk" and "antistatic"? isn`t it strange that silk on rotating glass was used in static generators in the early days of experiments in this field, pick any "fact" and it appears the same sort of thing applies
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 10:07, Reply)