I love news agencies, they always find the bit they want to:
Headline:
Child porn charges for 15-year-old who snapped self
for an article which later states:
The student has since been told there is a chance that the charges against her will be dismissed, but only if she adheres to a set of conditions governing mobile phone and internet usage.
Yes, it is preposterous, but there's an 18 or over rule for a reason, what she did *is* illegal, and if you look at the passage above it's more a case of "girl told 'don't do it again' after sending photos of her nude self to others."
Every day I arrive somewhat more at my conclusion that news organisations are just sneaky devious cunts.
(, Sun 28 Dec 2008, 2:09, Reply)
If it were legal an attractive 15 year old could make A LOT of money very quickly
(
hanke murphy, I'm a mess, Sun 28 Dec 2008, 2:43,
Reply)
yeah, and 18+ rules make a ton of sense for a species that hits puberty anywhere between 8 and 14....
i'm no paedophile, but the impossible nonsense resonating about intergenerational sex/the sexuality of people under (pick the age here) is absurd.
(
postbear has metal knees, Sun 28 Dec 2008, 3:51,
Reply)
