Chrysler makes a monumental misjudgement and the American people let them know big-time
(, Wed 21 Jan 2009, 10:39, Reply)
You could probably try doing so by holding onto something above your head (like a chin up bar) but that's a lot of effort. Also, you may need at least one free hand to guide the foot in accurately.
It would be a good idea, prior to changing feet, to wash the one that's not already in the mouth. You've probably been hopping around the office on that foot for some time, so it'll be quite sweaty and dirty. It you've still got shoes on, then it's especially important to think about cleaning. Think of all the nasty stuff, like dog do, that'll be on them. Yuck.
(, Wed 21 Jan 2009, 13:10, Reply)
better to say thanks than just pretend it didn't happen no?
(, Wed 21 Jan 2009, 13:51, Reply)
Was a bit foolhardy with that ad - what were they thinking. Still good to see they allowed the comments up and didn't cull the more negative ones...
I still find it insane the MPG US cars get. I drive an 11 year old car, a fairly big one at that, with a 2 litre engine and STILL get 40 to 45 mpg - my dad has the same car but the diesel version and gets 65 mpg on the motorway! This is a bog standard Rover 400 - nothing fancy. So why can't they produce something similar in the US? Is it that much cheaper to build an inefficent car? Even the Prius advertises 65 but only really delivers 55 mpg... it's madness!
(, Wed 21 Jan 2009, 13:52, Reply)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_per_gallon
"Note that because the imperial gallon is significantly larger than the U.S. gallon, MPG figures are 20.095% higher in the UK than in the U.S. for the same real fuel economy."
(, Wed 21 Jan 2009, 16:09, Reply)
They wouldn't have any comments at all. You'd think they'd lace them with comments from Chrysler employees or something. Maybe they hate themselves too.
(, Wed 21 Jan 2009, 16:45, Reply)