Sorry, I know we've had this discussion before, but still, I can't let that pass. How is 'There is probably no god, so stop worrying and enjoy your life' even comparable to the statements of fundamentalist religious nutters? When did Richard Dawkins advocate killing people who disagreed with him or blasphemed against the sacred word of Darwin? Get some perspective.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 13:55, Reply)
I am not saying that it does, however, I have never read a religious text that does sanction or advocate murder. That is down to the interpretation of certain people for their own ends. The point I was trying to make was that a fundamental discounting of anyones beliefs, either way, serves no purpose.
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:01, Reply)
then how can the word be relied upon?
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:20, Reply)
But that is the nature of humanity, no matter who put it here....
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:36, Reply)
clearly the bible has too many metaphors and hyperbole than any factual story
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:46, Reply)
Atheists generally believe there is no god because there is no evidence to suggest that there is one. It's easy to suggest examples of hypothetical evidence which, should it appear, would change their mind (cf my post above, but also Haldane's 'Fossil rabbits in the Precambrian').
Religious people believe despite the lack of evidence, and there is no evidence that you can suggest that would make them change their view (indeed, the whole 'virtue' of faith is that it is maintained despite the lack of evidence)
(, Thu 5 Feb 2009, 14:37, Reply)