If they had a chance to research their audience,
then they had a chance of at least making it 50/50.
(
@RBFesquire Good luck b3ta, was nice knowing you. So long., Tue 22 Jun 2010, 11:52,
Reply)
probably didn't get the numbers in time
I imagine it was all arranged a bit last minute, and the only people wanting to attend something like this would be the over zealous religious type, whereas all the atheists probably couldn't give a fuck, apart from that one fella who was probably retired and fancied a day out at that there london.
None of the panelists appeared to support the arguement about the lack of evidence for god, one was a priest/vicar/whatnot, a smug bitch and another journalist looking to appease the audience and having a weak arguement that he himself failed to support.
Should never have been commissioned, but then it's probably a low cost program to produce, so it's more of a filler than anything.
(
flapmeister knows where your mum lives, Tue 22 Jun 2010, 12:02,
Reply)
Thats true, point taken...
Cookie?
(
@RBFesquire Good luck b3ta, was nice knowing you. So long., Tue 22 Jun 2010, 12:03,
Reply)
yes please
but not that one which you rubbed your bell end on please.
(
flapmeister knows where your mum lives, Tue 22 Jun 2010, 12:06,
Reply)