should the interviewer have just sat down with him and had a good old bitch about how shitty the police are
or treat him as a normal human and ask him if he was being a cunt and throwing stuff
(, Tue 14 Dec 2010, 12:20, Reply)
Don't be ridiculous, actually listen to what the lad says, he cant use his chair by him self, as he says him self how the hell did he pose a threat to the police?
The interviewer is just being a needlessly combative cunt, and the lad talks a lot of sense. Now if he was simply trying to highlight how ridiculous it was for the police to behave in that way, well he could have done it in a much less patronising manner.
(
Jorvic, Tue 14 Dec 2010, 12:52,
Reply)
Yeah but i and the interviewer probably didn't have a clue to how disabled they guy is. He could not be able to walk but could throw shit hard and fast
So of course he's got to ask him if he did do anything. As you would anyone else. But because he's disabled everyone will feel sorry for the poor little defenceless guy. The interviewer didn't sound nasty he just asked him if he did wrong which apparently is a crime in itself if it's directed at a crip
(, Tue 14 Dec 2010, 17:28, Reply)