
it seems odd to me that people can't see that worshipping a god that according to the religion's own scripture would condemn you for your behaviour is counter-intuitive.
to be fair though, most people would be condemned to hell if they were to take the whole bible seriously. it seems that the majority of religious people are very selective about which bits of the book they take notice of
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 22:17, Reply)

my own (Unitarian) church doesn't even insist that the Bible is the word of God; I don't know what the Quaker's stance on scripture is but I know they're backing this, as well as the Liberal Jews.
I shouldn't need to point out that the Bible is very much open to interpretation. I actually quoted 1 Corinthians 7:9 on the form.
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 22:22, Reply)

but if your religion uses the bible and it's concepts as it's base, but doesn't actually believe what it says is actually true, what's the fucking point of that?
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 22:32, Reply)

The point is though that not every religion does, and it's no business of the state if it does or not.
BUT ask any Rabbi, Liberal or otherwise, and they'll tell you that Leviticus prohibits bumsex, not Special Best Friends Forever.
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 22:34, Reply)

There's also the concept of continuous revelation however this is not something I ascribe to.
( , Tue 22 Nov 2011, 2:37, Reply)

lucky no-one stakes their chance for immortality or base their entire life around it then eh?
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 22:41, Reply)

bah!
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 22:48, Reply)

well quite. I don't know what goes through their minds to be honest but I don't think the government should be pandering to it. Which is why I put my tuppenceworth on that there form.
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 22:50, Reply)

If you say that the bible is "very much open to interpretation" then you're saying that it isn't clear about its message. And if the bible isn't clear about what it's saying, why on earth would you base your life around it?
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 23:03, Reply)

According to Rudolph Bultmann, all you need to believe in to be a Christian is Christ crucified. I think it's fairly clear on at least that much.
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 23:15, Reply)

Not sure which, but I hope for your sake you just don't like confrontation.
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 23:19, Reply)

and not one I really want right now.
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 23:21, Reply)

Glad you're more secure in your religion than you first appear.
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 23:23, Reply)

"the religion itself is homophobic" - only to the same inherent level as it being anti beard shaving, or pro-slavery.
I repeat, I'm not christian I'm ignostic. I'm also pro-choice when it comes to churches.
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 22:24, Reply)

have I misunderstood, or are you saying gays shouldn't be allowed to marry in a church because the men at that church don't have beards?
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 22:42, Reply)

gays should have the same rights as anyone to do whatever the fuck they like. and religion is stupid
( , Mon 21 Nov 2011, 22:47, Reply)