(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 9:50, Reply)
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:04, Reply)
3 people is a nice start but the rule still stands.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:08, Reply)
Will that be enough?
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/9139055/David-Cameron-not-sympathetic-to-plight-of-alleged-arms-dealer-Christopher-Tappin-ahead-of-Obama-meeting.html
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:13, Reply)
Pretty much anyone with a large amount of money has done something unethical to get it (or inherited it from someone who did something unethical).
Right now you're at 4 people who have been pulled up on it. 5 including this guy that's about to be extradited. This is not a societal trend you are highlighting, it's just the rare few that get some sort of comeuppance.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:22, Reply)
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:31, Reply)
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:57, Reply)
You appear to be talking about something different.
Sorry for being under qualified to have a conversation with you.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 11:08, Reply)
"If everyone who did something they knew was unethical to make themselves money got this kind of attention then the world would be a very different place.
Seems to me that most of the rich people in the world have been unethical at one time or another. Pretty much a requisite for the job."
I guess you've been replying to a lot of different points in this thread so they might all be blending into one big thing for you, but this was point I was making and you haven't done a good job of refuting it.
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 11:14, Reply)
See we can both make short snappy answers that don't contribute to the conversation.
Arn't we cleaver?
(, Wed 14 Mar 2012, 10:35, Reply)