
children should have a say in what made up fairy tale they believe in.
Fuck religion, fuck their parents saying you must have part of your cock cut off because an imaginary friend said so.
If they want to do that, let them do it when they are 18, or better still after they've been psych tested and simply weighed up the options.
The sooner laws prevent gullible religious twats inflicting their doctrine on their kids the better.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 23:04, Reply)

At 8 days old, so it says.
It's easy for you to say that's fairy tale bullshit or whatever... question is, what happens if a government of a liberal democracy says it.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 23:12, Reply)

simple as that.
A government should protect its citizens from cults, scams, fraudsters and religions, especially when they intend to inflict physical alteration to them, until an age when they can make the choice for themselves.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 23:15, Reply)

Abortion is entirely down to the circumstance of the woman involved and certainly not a fucking church.
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 23:28, Reply)

does the government not have the duty to protect it?
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 23:32, Reply)

Where do you stand on a blowjob or a wank or a piss (which for a man who has passed puberty dumps sperm)?
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 23:41, Reply)

it would be nice if it did but what we've got has more to do with some concept of "viability" as far as I know. But supposing we take that cut-off point.
Would it be ok to circumcise a foetus, if it were possible, before the same time limit?
( , Fri 13 Jul 2012, 23:43, Reply)