well that is the interesting point isn't it? its not that you need a gun to kill someone or yourself
the South Africa statistic is intersting, in that it has a very high total homicide rate, 2/3rds of which are non-firearm.
Were I of the homicidal inclination, I'd have a wealth of creative options: bare hands, a kicking on the floor, kitchen knife, rock/brick/pool ball in a sock, garden tools, heavy household ornaments, the whole content of my tool box (except perhaps the tape measure), rat poison, and several plants growing in my garden including deadly nightshade, hemlock and in a few weeks the classic fly agaric mushroom.
Personally I'm of the opinion that prohibition is a sticking plaster measure at the best of times, we have to look to the cause of murder, not the tool used. Why are people angry enough to kill?
(, Fri 20 Jul 2012, 12:21, Reply)
absolutely,
often it's just a PR exercise so that the politicians can be seen to be doing something. After Dunblane, for instance, who got penalised? Legitimate gun sports clubs. They didn't do anything whatsoever to address the actual cause of the incident.
(
Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Fri 20 Jul 2012, 12:26,
Reply)