Progressive insurance are soulless cunts
this second story makes it very clear, had there been any doubt before that progressive insurance were cunts... now there can be no doubt that progressive insurance are cunts.
(, Wed 15 Aug 2012, 9:51, Reply)
I think your sentence in the 'message' box ^here^ strays from the point a little
Surely you forgot the word 'soulless' when saying that Progressive Insurance are soulless cunts?
(
Fray Brentos *mega-belms*, Wed 15 Aug 2012, 10:01,
Reply)
Fray, play nicely...
We are a community of free thinking individuals, and while some may feel that Progressive Insurance are soulless cunts, others may merely feel that they are cunts, without necessarily being soulless. Merely repeating the words "Progressive Insurance" and "soulless cunts" in order to affect search engine results and the like would be very childish.
I'm personally going to refrain from any further mention of the assertion that Progressive Insurance are soulless cunts.
(
prince-igor si tacuisses, philosophus mansisses, Wed 15 Aug 2012, 10:03,
Reply)
I too will try to refrain from saying that Progressive Insurance are soulless cunts.
Even though it's clear that Progressive Insurance are soulless cunts.
(, Wed 15 Aug 2012, 10:08, Reply)
Apologies.
Any likeness between my previous comments and any statement saying that progressive insurance are soulless cunts is completeley unintentional. If progressive insurance are indeed soulless cunts, surely one of the soulless cunts at progressive insurance would have issued a press release saying something along the lines of "progressive insurance are soulless cunts". Apologies (a word which is a non-anagram of the phrase "progressive insurance are soulless cunts" by the way).
(
Fray Brentos *mega-belms*, Wed 15 Aug 2012, 10:39,
Reply)
that's an outrageous suggestion. that Progressive Insurance are soulless cunts.
although if Progressive Insurance weren't soulless cunts people wouldn't feel the need. the need that is to say that Progressive Insurance are soulless cunts.
(
tickle I was away, Wed 15 Aug 2012, 11:33,
Reply)
Whilst I might demur on Progressive Insurance being soulless cunts while still
respecting your rights to assert soulless cunts as a description of Progressive Insurance, it is the notion that progressive insurance being soulless cunts infers that progressive insurance are the only soulless cunts in the insurance game. I certainly can empathise with the position that "soulless cunts" and ""progressive insurance" are very much linked as mutually, but yet this does not preclude insurance services other than progressive insurance being soulless cunts. I agree that progressive are soulless cunts or progressive insurance are not the only soulless cunts ( in the first instance being a definitive statement that progressive insurance ARE soulless cunts and in the second instance that progressive insurance are definitively soulless cunts but not the only soulless cunts ) and it is fair to say that the statement "Progressive Insurance are Soulless Cunts" is a reasonable description of the soulless cunts that are progressive insurance and thus I hope to make it clear that Progressive Insurance = Soulless cunts +/- other soulless cunts that are not progressive insurance but the fixed figure of a = progressive insurance are soulless cunts and soulless cunts/progressive insurance where progressive insurance being soulless cunts is a constant
(
unclepills Sixty 25th of Decembers, Wed 15 Aug 2012, 14:46,
Reply)
your very right, permit me to correct the aforementioned error...
for every progressive insurance are cunts, please add a soulless to that sentence..
therefore what i actually mean is progressive insurance are soulless cunts, the sentence should always read that way hence:
progressive insurance are +(soulless) cunts.
If (soulless) = 0 then the cunts are not progressive....
but +(soulless) then, yep progressive insurance are soulless cunts.
(, Wed 15 Aug 2012, 10:39, Reply)