I could be wrong
But that's how I understand it. Plus the woman he was with came back the next morning and brought him breakfast. Hardly the actions of a raped woman, surely.
But then we're on very dodgy ground. I just don't buy any of it though, it stinks.
(, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 15:42, Reply)
A second woman alledges he held her down and pressed his throbbing manhood against her.
Both cases seem conveniently hard to prove/disprove.
(
Draconacticus Reject shampoo. Demand real poo!, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 15:49,
Reply)
I don't know if anyone's mentioned it but he has really stupid hair too.
(
Pig Bodine., Thu 16 Aug 2012, 15:51,
Reply)
Shame they can't have their day in court to prove if they were raped or not eh?
Just had one of his luvvie mates on sating he can't be a rapist because he stay with his family and non of them were raped.
(
Cerebus Sticky! Sticky! Stick! Stick!, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 16:35,
Reply)
you really don't like him, do you? Is it a class thing?
There are a lot of irregularities about the case that people have commented on:
*the prosecutor is a known campaigner for anti-sexual violence, in sweden prosecutors are politically appointed
*The two accused did nothing until they found out he'd slept with them both, then their action was to apply to the police to force assange to have a STI test, not accuse him of rape.
*The prosecutors met with the women later and they changed their minds and entered a plea of rape
*One of the accused was tweeting 3 hours after the alleged rape occured what a great time she was having at a party and something about a cool sports car
*the prosecutors office leaked Assanges name on one of their blogs 2 hours after the charges were made, even though in Sweden anonymity is protected
*they refused assanges offer to answer questions in the pretrial by videolink, even though normally this has been offered for outside the country
*the two accusers have allegedly sent texts to their lawyers complaining that they expected to be paid that the prosecution has, but is refusing to release to the defence.
*the accusation is around the use and/or consent in the wearing of a condom, and weather it was ignored. Both accusers say the sex itself was consensual
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 17:30,
Reply)