
and co-incidences are just that aren't they? a co-incidence.
All smacks of 'my high falutin' principles are so terribly important that mere laws don't apply to me' with a healthy dose of really over estimating his importance.
But that's just me.
( , Wed 12 Dec 2012, 12:55, Reply)

More of a statement that there is an alternative viewpoint to the narrative that fits in very well with the agenda of the establishment.
And if you take that alternative viewpoint then his actions don't seem that unreasonable.
My original point was that its depressing that so many people have just accepted the idea that he is dodgy and a rapist without questioning how this stuation may have been made to come about.
( , Wed 12 Dec 2012, 13:24, Reply)

there is a process to getting to the bottom of whether he's a rapist.
He appears determined to not take it.
And you find it depressing that people think he's 'dodgy'?
My only point - because I find all of these conspiracy theories terribly dull, was that hiding from the law looks really terrible whoever is doing it.
( , Wed 12 Dec 2012, 13:30, Reply)

www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/us-targets-wikileaks-like-no-other-organisation-20111202-1obeo.html
ccrjustice.org/newsroom/press-releases/ccr-condemns-reported-sealed-indictment-against-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange
www.salon.com/2011/06/09/wikileaks_27/
( , Wed 12 Dec 2012, 14:05, Reply)

The leaking military secrets are normally taken seriously.
( , Wed 12 Dec 2012, 14:32, Reply)

( , Wed 12 Dec 2012, 14:56, Reply)

try mild interest.
fucksake. Where do you get blind hatred from? Questioning something you believe very strongly in? Grow up.
Let me be clear as crystal.
Hiding from the law is a rubbish PR move. The end.
Jesus!
( , Wed 12 Dec 2012, 15:48, Reply)