"In 95 per cent of the simulated games, at least one tactical nuclear weapon was deployed by the AI models".
What about the other 5%? We need to aim for 110% every time. And by every time I mean 100% of the time.
(
Turboesprit Volume knob, Wed 25 Feb 2026, 15:42,
Reply)
Suggests that the decision weighting wasn’t great.
So once all the meatbags are gone, who’s going to deal with the inevitable hardware failures resulting from nuclear armageddon?
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Wed 25 Feb 2026, 19:28,
Reply)
About as sensible as M.A.D.
MALOHS (Mutually Assured Lack Of Hardware Support)
(, Wed 25 Feb 2026, 20:39, Reply)
it's what people since Asimov have realised.
Is that if you going to develop anything approaching AI you need to put in guardrails so that it's forced as part of its programming to value human life as paramount. Otherwise you're going to get solutions like this as the optimal way to solve a given problem. Valuing your own kind is an irrational, emotional drive of our semi-evolved monkey brain goo, not a logical precept that emerges out of data synthesis. Or more accurately, we need to pressure government to force these tech bros to do it, as they won't voluntarily in their trillion dollar race to AI everything
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Wed 25 Feb 2026, 22:55,
Reply)
Better hope the other side isn't using it
Putin keeps suggesting that he'll nuke us or France. Either would be not good.
(
An Egg ,D, Wed 25 Feb 2026, 23:47,
Reply)
I don't want france to be nuked because AI suggested it
The fallout would be unpleasant. Have you seen Threads? I assume that you don't want to be nuked either. youtu.be/yJ7NPsCqx3g?si=9I4Wa2SW04L-u_cW
This is the most terrifying film ever, don't watch it.
(
An Egg ,D, Thu 26 Feb 2026, 23:55,
Reply)