Old Daily Mail article fails in every way.
Fail 1: We only have the old man's word to go on.
Fail 2: How can dog years/human years work mathematically? What human has lived to be 203?
Fail 3: Child level gramma error. Can you spot it?
Sorry for banality. I was sent to this article and had to let my bile out.
(
Kung_Fu_Russ ran out of amusing signatures on, Thu 16 Aug 2012, 23:45,
Reply)
.
1. True
2. Often wondered this meself, like.
3. Nope. Do tell.
(
sir_spicious2000 Crap I've watched: www.filmplop.blogspot.com/, Fri 17 Aug 2012, 0:12,
Reply)
Oh yeah.
Spotted now. Ta :)
(
sir_spicious2000 Crap I've watched: www.filmplop.blogspot.com/, Fri 17 Aug 2012, 1:39,
Reply)