
This bust struck me as very odd. The article doesn't comment on it, but it's such a realistic and dynamic portrait such that one wouldn't expect it to be from that time period.
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 16:17, Reply)

Often very realistic and I think a bit of precursor to a more stylistic Christian Orthodox Iconography.
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 16:20, Reply)

...except for being entirely in profile and having no sense of perspective or scale?
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 16:25, Reply)

These are odd portraits. I'm not sure if they were done before or after the Greeks took over Egypt, however.
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 16:46, Reply)

Sorry - I thought when you said tomb painting you meant the wall paintings. Yeah, the Mummy portraits are quite cool.
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 16:52, Reply)

I studied them for a year at Foundation along with other iconographic bollocks. I guess inevitably when it comes to a descriptive short hand I've managed to remember them as "Pass us those pictures of the Egyptian Tomb Paintings, would you dear?"
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 16:55, Reply)

never seen any of those before, or maybe I have but not known what they were
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 17:37, Reply)

I believe that that kind of realistic portrayal was pretty common in late ancient Greece and ancient Rome. Note that the sculpture is not supposed to depict someone handsome, but rather someone old (and therefore, by some Roman standards at least, someone ugly).
[/pseudo-intellectual mode]
( , Mon 28 Jun 2010, 18:39, Reply)