Around 100% of people would agree to spend more money on anything that sounds good.
Also, around 100% of people would agree to a decrease in their tax bill. (Obviously, this is in reply to the first bit, not the second bit, of your answer)
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Mon 27 Apr 2015, 16:47, 1 reply)

oh i dunno
quite a few people are in favour of higher taxes. but then again, usually for other people, not themselves, i guess.

i suspect 100% of people might pay to fund a gladiator battle between politicians. imagine a greased up ann widdecombe taking on harriet harman...
( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 27 Apr 2015, 17:21, closed)

I'm fairly sure I'd pay to not see that.

(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Mon 27 Apr 2015, 17:39, closed)

Which leads me to suggest an alternative to the BBC licence fee:
Pay nothing, and you get a digital sewer pumping bilge into your living room, like everyone currently has... you would then have the option to pay more to remove some portion of that shit, including all the adverts.

I'd pay to never see football, talent competitions, or any bits of the news where Owen Jones is wheeled out to cry about something.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Mon 27 Apr 2015, 17:42, closed)

I do imagine that, quite regularly.

(zebideedoodah likes florence but prefers venice, Mon 27 Apr 2015, 17:54, closed)