While you're at it
I don't even have a babysitter. I mean, what the fuck was I thinking, eh?
( the pink chicken sniffer sniffs pink chickens., Thu 4 Nov 2010, 11:54, 1 reply)

Oh Christ no, I don't give a shit about *factual* inaccuracy.
This is, as has been astutely observed on many occasions, QOTW/the internet. If I were to jump on every occasion of untruth that appeared before me, I'd reach a level of petty nitpicking far below that of the pedantry of grammar and form. Who would be that obsessive?

Also, humour and particularly grammar have rules that are a lot easier to spot. Nobody can reliably tell if something's true or not, but words are definitely either spelled correctly or not.
(Falstaff's Spiritual Successor, Thu 4 Nov 2010, 12:12, closed)

"Who would be that obsessive?"
I can think of a few....

I just thought I put the OP up as it was a spin on a particularly less PC joke that I read on sickipedia. I really am partial to an awful joke (in all senses of the word) and this was my attempt!

Having said, that, I'll grade myself: D-. Must try harder.
( the pink chicken sniffer sniffs pink chickens., Thu 4 Nov 2010, 12:19, closed)

A few of that sort of purely theoretical awful bore? Surely not!
Anyway, I'm not sure why I jumped on this particular post so hard. I do that sometimes. I blame coffee. When I don't have coffee, I blame the lack of coffee. Win-win.
(Falstaff's Spiritual Successor, Thu 4 Nov 2010, 12:28, closed)

Yep, those theoretical bastards.
Theoretically using an old idea to theoretically bore the spanners off of people by posting theoretical repetitive posts that ran their course a very very long time ago, and should probably just fuck off back to /theoretalk.

Theoretically speaking. of course.
( the pink chicken sniffer sniffs pink chickens., Thu 4 Nov 2010, 12:33, closed)

Also
ZOMG MASSIVE CAFFEINE DRUGZ!!!ELEVENTYONE!!!1
( the pink chicken sniffer sniffs pink chickens., Thu 4 Nov 2010, 12:34, closed)