Bizarre leaps of logic
Amorous Badger says: "I once humorously suggested that someone had been internet-stalking a Big Brother contestant. They concluded that I was threatening them. What's the oddest misunderstanding you've been involved in?"
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 13:48)
Amorous Badger says: "I once humorously suggested that someone had been internet-stalking a Big Brother contestant. They concluded that I was threatening them. What's the oddest misunderstanding you've been involved in?"
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 13:48)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
do you threaten them with violence and call them "subhuman vermin"
you know, like you do on here
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 22:28, 1 reply)
you know, like you do on here
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 22:28, 1 reply)
Not sure I've actually threatened anyone on here, although clearly commenting on what I might have done had I been placed in the situation another user was, crossed a line (adequate modding might have prevented the need)
As for insults, no - people on the Guardian forums might be unrealistic in their aspirations but at least the ones I choose to interact with are interested in making the world a better place. Trolls, on the other hand, set out to cause pain to strangers, spread distress, embarrass and unmask.
I stick to an old-fashioned and perhaps slightly discredited view that people exist to make the world better - and that those who explicitly go against that are something less than fully human.
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 22:35, closed)
PROTIP: you're the problem here, "trolls" don't exist outside your head
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 22:40, closed)
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 22:40, closed)
You are welcome to your opinion. What I have seen fits a definition that I hold of what trolling is - I could quote examples but dont want to drag up an issue that was adequately covered in the previous QOTW and wont really benefit from re-examination
The examples in mind, to me were disgraceful.
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 22:44, closed)
so "troll" is an arbitrary term that means whatever you say it means
I see
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 22:51, closed)
I see
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 22:51, closed)
if we're going down to that level, isn't everything on the internet about how people define the words on the screen? We exist in a world where we cant read body language or tonal inflection after all...
(OK I've now managed to hamstring my own point by refusing to quote examples - but I'm sticking to that as it'd be lame not to)
g'nite..
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 22:54, closed)
Hehe
A least this is a kmuch more reasonable and polite argument than some of the ones you can get into on there.
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 0:01, closed)
A least this is a kmuch more reasonable and polite argument than some of the ones you can get into on there.
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 0:01, closed)
Well I've been away recently
And haven't seen whatever incident of trolling/flouncing is being referred to, so I'm not sure what's going on, really.
I enjoyed the fairly quick move to define "trolling", though. Good move.
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 0:26, closed)
And haven't seen whatever incident of trolling/flouncing is being referred to, so I'm not sure what's going on, really.
I enjoyed the fairly quick move to define "trolling", though. Good move.
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 0:26, closed)
I'd be fascinated to learn how being a pompous, self-righteous prick with no self awareness and anger issues is making the world a better place.
I say 'fascinated'. I mean 'shut up, you unutterably dull child'.
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 8:21, closed)
I say 'fascinated'. I mean 'shut up, you unutterably dull child'.
( , Fri 13 Dec 2013, 8:21, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread