Bizarre leaps of logicAmorous Badger says: "I once humorously suggested that someone had been internet-stalking a Big Brother contestant. They concluded that I was threatening them. What's the oddest misunderstanding you've been involved in?"
(
Scaryduck LIKES EGG, Thu 12 Dec 2013, 13:48)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I have a problem with the first assumption"If the Bible were not true, logic would not be meaningful"
I don't get that logic at all.
(
Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Mon 16 Dec 2013, 11:11,
1 reply)
indeed3 can correctly be deduced from 1 & 2 being true. it's just that there's no reason to suppose 1 is true in the first place
(
plentyofants more ghee, vicar?, Mon 16 Dec 2013, 11:37,
closed)
It's true because God said so, is their argument.Which is why they should all be sectioned. And then shot and burned for fuel.
(
BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Mon 16 Dec 2013, 12:09,
closed)
1 The bible is the word of god. 2. God exists because the bible says so.Brilliant.
(
Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Mon 16 Dec 2013, 12:16,
closed)
But Christians don't hold the Bible to be the word of God.Muslims might view the Qur'an that way, but the Christian approach to the Bible has always been that the Bible is the corrected writings of various individuals who have born witness to things.
Of course, I may have only met non-crazy Christians.
(
monster munch person, man, woman... camera... TV?, Mon 16 Dec 2013, 15:44,
closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread