
We love books. Tell us about your favourite books and authors, and why they are so good. And while you're at it - having dined out for years on the time I threw Dan Brown out of a train window - tell us who to avoid.
( , Thu 5 Jan 2012, 13:40)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Other than the fact that the entire story is an absurd fantasy playing out in the main character's head?*
It's all perfectly sane, if you compare it with Glamorama.
*Spoiler alert, by the way.
( , Fri 6 Jan 2012, 14:51, 1 reply)

that would be what's wrong with it.
But, meh, like I said. Personal opinion. I just found it to be a total emporer's new clothes thing when it came out.
it's not that much of a spoiler. if you're reading it and you think he really did fuck the neck of a tramp or shove an acid-covered drainpipe up a hooker's clunge just to introduce a starved rat into her, I reckon you should probably go back to The Very Hungry Caterpillar.
( , Fri 6 Jan 2012, 14:53, closed)

I quite liked Less than Zero.
( , Fri 6 Jan 2012, 14:57, closed)

refuse to ever do so again. Writing deliberately badly as a plot point is neither big nor clever, it's just fucking annoying. Quite possibly, if you have more patience than me, there's a great book in there. Well, I guess there must be given those defending it on here.
( , Fri 6 Jan 2012, 16:33, closed)

What's not to love?
( , Fri 6 Jan 2012, 15:09, closed)

it's obviously deliberate, and part of the whole ethos of the thing, but that sort of arse really fucking annoys me.
( , Fri 6 Jan 2012, 16:31, closed)

up to the point where he becomes involved with a running gun battle with the SWAT teams - then it becomes abundantly clear that his mind snapped, somewhere back at the beginning of the story.
I see it as a neat little satire of yuppie culture, buried inside a fairly purile story.
Like you say, each to their own.
( , Fri 6 Jan 2012, 15:13, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread