Books
We love books. Tell us about your favourite books and authors, and why they are so good. And while you're at it - having dined out for years on the time I threw Dan Brown out of a train window - tell us who to avoid.
( , Thu 5 Jan 2012, 13:40)
We love books. Tell us about your favourite books and authors, and why they are so good. And while you're at it - having dined out for years on the time I threw Dan Brown out of a train window - tell us who to avoid.
( , Thu 5 Jan 2012, 13:40)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Not that I agree with what she did to library books
but nice displays of knee-jerk misogyny here, guys.
( , Sun 8 Jan 2012, 8:47, 3 replies)
but nice displays of knee-jerk misogyny here, guys.
( , Sun 8 Jan 2012, 8:47, 3 replies)
Misogyny
But I was having a go at Joe Orton. If it was anything apart from smug smart-arsery, which it is, it would be homophobia, which it's not.
( , Sun 8 Jan 2012, 11:07, closed)
But I was having a go at Joe Orton. If it was anything apart from smug smart-arsery, which it is, it would be homophobia, which it's not.
( , Sun 8 Jan 2012, 11:07, closed)
I'm going to be fair and balanced here and point out that everyone in this thread is coming across as a massive prick.
( , Sun 8 Jan 2012, 11:37, closed)
( , Sun 8 Jan 2012, 11:37, closed)
Or, more likely... wait for it... a REALLY SMALL PRICK!!!!!
(I'm implying they have small penises)
( , Sun 8 Jan 2012, 15:27, closed)
(I'm implying they have small penises)
( , Sun 8 Jan 2012, 15:27, closed)
By blatantly trying to get into her pants like this, you are technically committing sexual assault.
Misogynist! Rapist! Pinko! Commie! Terrorist!
( , Sun 8 Jan 2012, 15:52, closed)
Misogynist! Rapist! Pinko! Commie! Terrorist!
( , Sun 8 Jan 2012, 15:52, closed)
There aren't many other ways to describe the behaviour of someone who tries to get into your pants without your consent.
( , Mon 9 Jan 2012, 23:16, closed)
( , Mon 9 Jan 2012, 23:16, closed)
They tell me, don't feed the trolls, but...
The thing about consent is that you don't get to decide for another adult whether they give it or not. You appear to be assuming that not only am I incapable of granting or denying consenting on my own behalf, but that the only correct answer to (supposed) sexual advances from a man is no.
You didn't miss the bit where I explained that the original context is from the 1970s and I am no longer 8 years old?
( , Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:12, closed)
The thing about consent is that you don't get to decide for another adult whether they give it or not. You appear to be assuming that not only am I incapable of granting or denying consenting on my own behalf, but that the only correct answer to (supposed) sexual advances from a man is no.
You didn't miss the bit where I explained that the original context is from the 1970s and I am no longer 8 years old?
( , Tue 10 Jan 2012, 13:12, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread