data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a question"
What's your favourite one that you almost believe? And why? We're popping on our tinfoil hats and very much looking forward to your answers. (Thanks to Shezam for this suggestion.)
( , Thu 1 Dec 2011, 13:47)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
Lead, DDT, CFC are companies slowing down the science facts. (Again I am no expert and can't be arsed to look up the facts so working on memory here). Once science spotted the mistakes, the companies dragged their feet. but eventually they found solutions - again with science.
The example from the OP is very different as he is using totally unrelated "facts" and forcing them to "fit" a "theory" while ignoring all the other information that shows the "theory" is bullsh*t. That ain't science, that is selling books to weak minded people.
( , Tue 6 Dec 2011, 22:16, 1 reply)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
The trade-off being that while propane and butane are natural gases and don't have such a harmful effect on the upper atmosphere, they're much more flammable and explosive. To satisfy safety regulations, most aerosol-filling factories needed to have the cans sealed in a separate annexe - and it had to be designed to fall away from the main building in the event of a structurally compromising explosion.
( , Tue 6 Dec 2011, 22:51, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread