Conspiracy Theories
What's your favourite one that you almost believe? And why? We're popping on our tinfoil hats and very much looking forward to your answers. (Thanks to Shezam for this suggestion.)
( , Thu 1 Dec 2011, 13:47)
What's your favourite one that you almost believe? And why? We're popping on our tinfoil hats and very much looking forward to your answers. (Thanks to Shezam for this suggestion.)
( , Thu 1 Dec 2011, 13:47)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
the depletion continues
TBH I've only scanned the wiki page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion but as I understand it CFCs have been reduced but the ones put out in the past are still causing significant damage. A CFC molecule can stay in the atmosphere for about 100 years.
There's some predictions saying that the problem will bottom out and it'll improve again. But we're not on that upslope, or even that bottom. We're still going down the hill. I repeat. The depletion is getting worse.
( , Wed 7 Dec 2011, 14:58, 1 reply)
TBH I've only scanned the wiki page en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion but as I understand it CFCs have been reduced but the ones put out in the past are still causing significant damage. A CFC molecule can stay in the atmosphere for about 100 years.
There's some predictions saying that the problem will bottom out and it'll improve again. But we're not on that upslope, or even that bottom. We're still going down the hill. I repeat. The depletion is getting worse.
( , Wed 7 Dec 2011, 14:58, 1 reply)
Apparently Concorde used to replenish the ozone layer...
Part of its exhaust gases comprised ozone, or something. I'm not sure why it was only Concorde, or why they didn't figure out how it did it and make all planes do the same thing.
/useless fact and rubbish idea
( , Wed 7 Dec 2011, 15:50, closed)
Part of its exhaust gases comprised ozone, or something. I'm not sure why it was only Concorde, or why they didn't figure out how it did it and make all planes do the same thing.
/useless fact and rubbish idea
( , Wed 7 Dec 2011, 15:50, closed)
"Concorde produced nitrogen oxides in its exhaust, which, despite complicated chemical interactions with other ozone-depleting chemicals, are understood to result in degradation to the ozone layer at the stratospheric altitudes it cruised.[177] It has been pointed out that other, lower-flying, airliners produce ozone during their flights in the troposphere, but vertical transit of gases between the layers is restricted. The small fleet operated meant overall ozone-layer degradation caused by Concorde was negligible"
( , Wed 7 Dec 2011, 19:53, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread