Yeah,
This is what I was initially inclined to think (see my earlier replies above). I tend to think things are quite clear-cut, and the fact that she was actively out looking for sex and appeared to be borderline legal made me think it was all fine. But the others do have a point, she was under-developed, could have been vulnerable etc... and creatrix didn't really seem to consider it, it was just another shag. :( I don't know. The whole thing makes me feel very wretched, since I quite like the petite look personally... and all the hate going on up there is... a bit disturbing.
(idle insomniac enjoys listening to Sigur Rós at stupid hours, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 15:58, 2 replies)

Fair play...
Morally it's wrong and I'd probably have freaked out that she was underage, not got turned on again. But drunken people do daft stuff, both of them had a good time. All the shit said up there is unneeded.
(Freak on a Leash is jerking off to centre himself on, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 16:09, closed)

Thats fine
you can think that, you may well be correct in your assertion, I'm not really in the mood to debate it, what you really shouldn't do on the internet, and in particular on B3ta, is climb aboard your moral high horse and spout off that he's a paedophile.

edit - Sorry, i'm no implying that you did. I'm actually making the same point as the above reply, everyone else hysteria was totally over the top and simply makes them look like gormless clunge lice.
( Bazongaloid, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 16:19, closed)

Your right
...thats all there is to it really. He's not a paedophile, I highly doubt he'd be on here talking about it if he was

*edit*

Gormless Clunge Lice...I'm going to call someone that at work tonight
(Freak on a Leash is jerking off to centre himself on, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 16:23, closed)

Point taken
*gets off horse*

My bad, sorry for the flaming. I guess this hit a lil closer to home than I should have let it.
(thecurriedavenger, Mon 8 Dec 2008, 19:41, closed)