Driven to Madness
Captain Placid asks: What annoying things do significant others, workmates and other people in general do that drive you up the wall? Do you want to kill your other half over their obsessive fridge magnet collection? Driven to distraction over your manager's continued use of Comic Sans (The Font of Champions)? Tell us.
( , Thu 4 Oct 2012, 12:11)
Captain Placid asks: What annoying things do significant others, workmates and other people in general do that drive you up the wall? Do you want to kill your other half over their obsessive fridge magnet collection? Driven to distraction over your manager's continued use of Comic Sans (The Font of Champions)? Tell us.
( , Thu 4 Oct 2012, 12:11)
« Go Back
Among other things, I currently get to grade essays.
I hate the phrase 'in fact'. Usually what this means is that the student hasn't got any back up for their argument and has decided to say it's a fact in the hope that I won't question it.
Everything in their essay should already be a fact, so I wonder if I should then put crosses everywhere that they haven't written 'in fact' on the basis that those claims clearly aren't as factual?
( , Mon 8 Oct 2012, 16:40, 4 replies)
I hate the phrase 'in fact'. Usually what this means is that the student hasn't got any back up for their argument and has decided to say it's a fact in the hope that I won't question it.
Everything in their essay should already be a fact, so I wonder if I should then put crosses everywhere that they haven't written 'in fact' on the basis that those claims clearly aren't as factual?
( , Mon 8 Oct 2012, 16:40, 4 replies)
It's a valid expression when you're contrasting a previous claim or situation mentioned that was false or the reverse of expectations.
The coalition forces expected an easy victory and to impose their will on Iraq. In fact, the post-invasion period was a decade of continued conflict.
( , Mon 8 Oct 2012, 17:22, closed)
In colliquial language, yes,
but the tone would be more formal with the use of 'however' instead. I'm sure the BBC write like that, but they currently seem to have a campaign to encourage one-sentence paragraphs, so I'm not going to hold them up as a standard of formal written English.
The coalition forces expected an easy victory and to impose their will on Iraq; however, the post-invasion period was a decade of continued conflict.
( , Mon 8 Oct 2012, 17:32, closed)
but the tone would be more formal with the use of 'however' instead. I'm sure the BBC write like that, but they currently seem to have a campaign to encourage one-sentence paragraphs, so I'm not going to hold them up as a standard of formal written English.
The coalition forces expected an easy victory and to impose their will on Iraq; however, the post-invasion period was a decade of continued conflict.
( , Mon 8 Oct 2012, 17:32, closed)
I agree with you that before using such an expression
or "in point of fact"
or the politician's favourite "the reality is"
you should be on fairly firm ground that it is a fact. But I don't see any great linguistic advantage "however" has over "in fact".
My personal favourite to use is "as it turns out". It seems you have already researched some mysterious external authority when you use it.
"As it turns out, china has more overweight people than the US"
( , Mon 8 Oct 2012, 20:26, closed)
or "in point of fact"
or the politician's favourite "the reality is"
you should be on fairly firm ground that it is a fact. But I don't see any great linguistic advantage "however" has over "in fact".
My personal favourite to use is "as it turns out". It seems you have already researched some mysterious external authority when you use it.
"As it turns out, china has more overweight people than the US"
( , Mon 8 Oct 2012, 20:26, closed)
« Go Back