Famous people I hate
Michael McIntyre, says our glorious leader. Everyone loves Michael McIntyre. Even the Daily Mail loves Michael McIntyre. Therefore, he must be a git. Who gets on your nerves?
Hint: A list of names, possibly including the words 'Katie Price' and 'Nuff said' does not an interesting answer make
( , Thu 4 Feb 2010, 12:21)
Michael McIntyre, says our glorious leader. Everyone loves Michael McIntyre. Even the Daily Mail loves Michael McIntyre. Therefore, he must be a git. Who gets on your nerves?
Hint: A list of names, possibly including the words 'Katie Price' and 'Nuff said' does not an interesting answer make
( , Thu 4 Feb 2010, 12:21)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Pretty much
The difference to be noted is the standard deviation of the scale you've chosen if you need to compare.
For most IQ tests that a psychologist administers, the SD is 15. So an IQ of 130+ is the top 5%. For most tests that people quote, the SD is 21-23, so an IQ of 140+ is in the top 5%.
This means that most psychologists worth their salt use percentiles to avoid confusion. So you'll usually get a percentile range (eg 75th-84th percentile) which you can then convert to whatever score you "want".
Basic statistics really needs to be covered at school. All I remember is asking people about their favourite ice cream flavour and charting it...
( , Wed 10 Feb 2010, 15:16, Reply)
The difference to be noted is the standard deviation of the scale you've chosen if you need to compare.
For most IQ tests that a psychologist administers, the SD is 15. So an IQ of 130+ is the top 5%. For most tests that people quote, the SD is 21-23, so an IQ of 140+ is in the top 5%.
This means that most psychologists worth their salt use percentiles to avoid confusion. So you'll usually get a percentile range (eg 75th-84th percentile) which you can then convert to whatever score you "want".
Basic statistics really needs to be covered at school. All I remember is asking people about their favourite ice cream flavour and charting it...
( , Wed 10 Feb 2010, 15:16, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread