First World Problems
Onemunki says: We live in a world of genuine tragedy, starvation and terror. So, after hearing stories of cruise line passengers complaining at the air conditioning breaking down, what stories of sheer single-minded self-pity get your goat?
( , Thu 1 Mar 2012, 12:00)
Onemunki says: We live in a world of genuine tragedy, starvation and terror. So, after hearing stories of cruise line passengers complaining at the air conditioning breaking down, what stories of sheer single-minded self-pity get your goat?
( , Thu 1 Mar 2012, 12:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
...and if they stopped hitting their kids, they'd be model parents?
I really can't be arsed to argue though. It's one of those circular arguements:
A: I think xxx, here's a why: rhubarb rhubarb, reasonable arguement
B: I disagree, because (presents opinions whether they correspond to the first arguements or not)
A: Did you read what I said/even more vague opinions, descending in quality as they go
B: See A above, with side order of (stereotype containing only a small % fact) is my evidence
A: Well, (faintly ridiculous stereotype containing similar % fact) supports my arguement
Repeat with increasingly sillier "examples", until:
A/B: You Grauniad reading, liberal wishy washy left wing loonie, wearing sandals, wanking into the communist manifesto
B/A: You daily heil reading, physcopathic nazi child beating fox hunting tory bumming.......
I used to like debating, but the internet has ruined it. Seems to be no room for "you have a point, but..." or "OK, I see where you're coming from but...". Just an endless, depressing round of the above, whilst anyone with any real power fills their pockets, and in doing so masnages to make everyones worst nightmares come true.
Edited to be nearer what I meant to say, I got depressed half way through the first time
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 22:54, 2 replies)
I really can't be arsed to argue though. It's one of those circular arguements:
A: I think xxx, here's a why: rhubarb rhubarb, reasonable arguement
B: I disagree, because (presents opinions whether they correspond to the first arguements or not)
A: Did you read what I said/even more vague opinions, descending in quality as they go
B: See A above, with side order of (stereotype containing only a small % fact) is my evidence
A: Well, (faintly ridiculous stereotype containing similar % fact) supports my arguement
Repeat with increasingly sillier "examples", until:
A/B: You Grauniad reading, liberal wishy washy left wing loonie, wearing sandals, wanking into the communist manifesto
B/A: You daily heil reading, physcopathic nazi child beating fox hunting tory bumming.......
I used to like debating, but the internet has ruined it. Seems to be no room for "you have a point, but..." or "OK, I see where you're coming from but...". Just an endless, depressing round of the above, whilst anyone with any real power fills their pockets, and in doing so masnages to make everyones worst nightmares come true.
Edited to be nearer what I meant to say, I got depressed half way through the first time
( , Mon 5 Mar 2012, 22:54, 2 replies)
nah, you're just a fucking idiot.
I bet your parents didn't hit you enough as a kid.
( , Tue 6 Mar 2012, 8:40, closed)
I bet your parents didn't hit you enough as a kid.
( , Tue 6 Mar 2012, 8:40, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread