First World Problems
Onemunki says: We live in a world of genuine tragedy, starvation and terror. So, after hearing stories of cruise line passengers complaining at the air conditioning breaking down, what stories of sheer single-minded self-pity get your goat?
( , Thu 1 Mar 2012, 12:00)
Onemunki says: We live in a world of genuine tragedy, starvation and terror. So, after hearing stories of cruise line passengers complaining at the air conditioning breaking down, what stories of sheer single-minded self-pity get your goat?
( , Thu 1 Mar 2012, 12:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Ahem and now for the unjust bit -
Mr Osborne confirmed the cut would hit homes with a single or two high earners but families with two parents on incomes up to £44,000 - which might add up together to over £80,000 - would keep the benefit.
( , Tue 6 Mar 2012, 11:12, 1 reply)
Mr Osborne confirmed the cut would hit homes with a single or two high earners but families with two parents on incomes up to £44,000 - which might add up together to over £80,000 - would keep the benefit.
( , Tue 6 Mar 2012, 11:12, 1 reply)
Yes, that's
what I was talking about.
It's a different argument to the usual one.
Most gripes are about the poorer people losing. This one is about affluent people winning.
( , Tue 6 Mar 2012, 11:20, closed)
what I was talking about.
It's a different argument to the usual one.
Most gripes are about the poorer people losing. This one is about affluent people winning.
( , Tue 6 Mar 2012, 11:20, closed)
It's just been badly managed
In essence the pittence (£20 per week) that is given anyway should be given to poorer households where it actually makes a difference, that will be a weeks shopping for people in poverty, so agree with your argument from a pratical sense but once again the cabinet of millionaires has got it very wrong.
( , Tue 6 Mar 2012, 12:46, closed)
In essence the pittence (£20 per week) that is given anyway should be given to poorer households where it actually makes a difference, that will be a weeks shopping for people in poverty, so agree with your argument from a pratical sense but once again the cabinet of millionaires has got it very wrong.
( , Tue 6 Mar 2012, 12:46, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread