First World Problems
Onemunki says: We live in a world of genuine tragedy, starvation and terror. So, after hearing stories of cruise line passengers complaining at the air conditioning breaking down, what stories of sheer single-minded self-pity get your goat?
( , Thu 1 Mar 2012, 12:00)
Onemunki says: We live in a world of genuine tragedy, starvation and terror. So, after hearing stories of cruise line passengers complaining at the air conditioning breaking down, what stories of sheer single-minded self-pity get your goat?
( , Thu 1 Mar 2012, 12:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
It did work, but far too slowly.
Whilst I sometimes wish it would go back to those days, people did get less work done in a day than they do now.
When computers first entered offices everyone was told it heralded the three day week and meant that eventually everyone would work from home. That didn't happen because companies worked out they got more work from people if they kept them in an office for as long as possible.
( , Thu 8 Mar 2012, 11:30, 1 reply)
Whilst I sometimes wish it would go back to those days, people did get less work done in a day than they do now.
When computers first entered offices everyone was told it heralded the three day week and meant that eventually everyone would work from home. That didn't happen because companies worked out they got more work from people if they kept them in an office for as long as possible.
( , Thu 8 Mar 2012, 11:30, 1 reply)
I guess it depends on the nature of your business
When you're working on projects that take months or years to complete, then the old ways are probably just as good as the new. I think not having instant communication meant delegating much more authority to lower levels of management, which is probably a good thing, instead of the CIO being involved in every decision.
( , Thu 8 Mar 2012, 11:53, closed)
When you're working on projects that take months or years to complete, then the old ways are probably just as good as the new. I think not having instant communication meant delegating much more authority to lower levels of management, which is probably a good thing, instead of the CIO being involved in every decision.
( , Thu 8 Mar 2012, 11:53, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread