I'll tell you something I have got
turned onto -
Ignore2.0.

Months ago I railed against this idea and it's implementation. To me back then it seemed so pointless to make it a 'double blind' setup, particularly in light of the fact that all you need to do to surpass it is to simply logout.

These days. I've changed my tune. Best, most useful implementation of an ignore function on a forum EVAR!
I log out on Fri to see which of the shit-flingers got their pointless one-liners onto the popular page but apart from that it's actually made this place far more read-able.
So, if like me you're sick of the dribbly faeces flingers - stick 'em on ignore. It does actually work! Whodathunkit?
*Matter of fact, quite a few of them won't even be clever enough to logout to read this!*
(s0ckpuppet logging out to reply to you if you're not careful, Sun 18 Aug 2013, 1:50, 11 replies)

Sometimes
it is just better to go for a walk, or make yourself a sandwich, watch a movie, talk to a flesh and blood friend, go for a smoke, have a beer,...
There are a hundred things that are better.
Turn it off and do something else for a while.
(the other guy not the one that gave you coochie warts, Sun 18 Aug 2013, 5:07, closed)

True.
And yep, I've had a great morning coaching my daughter's soccer team and am soon to crack a coldy.

But for when you are here on this website, specifically to interact with your fellow b3tans then nothing, and I mean nothing gets rid of the annoying buzz of non-story posting, shit-stirring, pointless repetitive posters like


Wouldn't you agree?
(s0ckpuppet logging out to reply to you if you're not careful, Sun 18 Aug 2013, 5:58, closed)

To be completely honest...
It does sound like you WANT them to log out, read it, and then comment. I understand you've received a large amount of abuse from them, but you seem to be encouraging it here.
(searlichek, Sun 18 Aug 2013, 16:44, closed)

TRUFAX
2.0
( Tesco Quality 60.825659, -0.788337, Mon 19 Aug 2013, 3:27, closed)

Fair point.
But if it gets more people putting the stirrers on ignore then eventually all they'll be doing is chasing their own tails.
(s0ckpuppet logging out to reply to you if you're not careful, Mon 19 Aug 2013, 5:59, closed)

How I perceived this
LOOK AT MEIgnore2.0.LOOK AT ME

Months agoLOOK AT ME I railed againstLOOK AT ME this ideaLOOK AT ME and it's implementation. ToLOOK AT ME me back then it seemedLOOK AT ME so pointless toLOOK AT ME make it aLOOK AT ME 'double blind' setupLOOK AT ME, particularlyLOOK AT ME in lightLOOK AT ME of the factLOOK AT ME that all you needLOOK AT ME to do toLOOK AT ME surpass itLOOK AT ME is to simply logoutLOOK AT ME.

These daysLOOK AT ME. I've changed myLOOK AT ME tune. BestLOOK AT ME, most useful implementationLOOK AT ME of an ignore function on a forum EVAR! LOOK AT ME
I log outLOOK AT ME on FriLOOK AT ME to seeLOOK AT ME which of theLOOK AT ME shit-flingersLOOK AT ME got their pointlessLOOK AT ME one-linersLOOK AT ME onto the popular pageLOOK AT ME but apart from that it's actuallyLOOK AT ME made this placeLOOK AT ME far more read-able.
So, if like meLOOK AT ME you're sickLOOK AT ME of the dribbly faecesLOOK AT ME flingers - stick 'em onLOOK AT ME ignore. It doesLOOK AT ME actually work! Whodathunkit?LOOK AT ME
*Matter of factLOOK AT ME, quite a fewLOOK AT ME of themLOOK AT ME won'tLOOK AT ME evenLOOK AT ME beLOOK AT ME cleverLOOK AT ME enoughLOOK AT ME toLOOK AT ME logoutLOOK AT ME toLOOK AT ME readLOOK AT ME this!*LOOK AT ME
(McChinaman banned, Mon 19 Aug 2013, 13:25, closed)

Hedgy did it better I'm afraid. :[

(s0ckpuppet logging out to reply to you if you're not careful, Mon 19 Aug 2013, 22:48, closed)

I feel it would be better if the reply count didn't include messages from people ignoring you though.
That way certain easily upset forum users wouldn't be able to feel they had claimed a victory, however pathetically small, every time someone they had taken a dislike to clicked to read the replies to a post only to find there were none visible.
( 2 Can Chunder Word to your mums, I came to prod bums, Mon 19 Aug 2013, 14:09, closed)

So you log out to read the posts you've ignored?
What a spectacularly pointless waste of time.
(Eukanuba, Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:52, closed)

It's good to cover all your bases.

(s0ckpuppet logging out to reply to you if you're not careful, Mon 19 Aug 2013, 22:49, closed)