How I perceived this
LOOK AT MEIgnore2.0.LOOK AT ME

Months agoLOOK AT ME I railed againstLOOK AT ME this ideaLOOK AT ME and it's implementation. ToLOOK AT ME me back then it seemedLOOK AT ME so pointless toLOOK AT ME make it aLOOK AT ME 'double blind' setupLOOK AT ME, particularlyLOOK AT ME in lightLOOK AT ME of the factLOOK AT ME that all you needLOOK AT ME to do toLOOK AT ME surpass itLOOK AT ME is to simply logoutLOOK AT ME.

These daysLOOK AT ME. I've changed myLOOK AT ME tune. BestLOOK AT ME, most useful implementationLOOK AT ME of an ignore function on a forum EVAR! LOOK AT ME
I log outLOOK AT ME on FriLOOK AT ME to seeLOOK AT ME which of theLOOK AT ME shit-flingersLOOK AT ME got their pointlessLOOK AT ME one-linersLOOK AT ME onto the popular pageLOOK AT ME but apart from that it's actuallyLOOK AT ME made this placeLOOK AT ME far more read-able.
So, if like meLOOK AT ME you're sickLOOK AT ME of the dribbly faecesLOOK AT ME flingers - stick 'em onLOOK AT ME ignore. It doesLOOK AT ME actually work! Whodathunkit?LOOK AT ME
*Matter of factLOOK AT ME, quite a fewLOOK AT ME of themLOOK AT ME won'tLOOK AT ME evenLOOK AT ME beLOOK AT ME cleverLOOK AT ME enoughLOOK AT ME toLOOK AT ME logoutLOOK AT ME toLOOK AT ME readLOOK AT ME this!*LOOK AT ME
(McChinaman banned, Mon 19 Aug 2013, 13:25, 2 replies)

Hedgy did it better I'm afraid. :[

(s0ckpuppet logging out to reply to you if you're not careful, Mon 19 Aug 2013, 22:48, closed)