Things I've gone off
Spimf says: I've always enjoyed listening to Pink Floyd, but lately I've noticed if my iPod plays any of their tracks, I skip them. I'm starting to realise I've gone off them. What have you gone off lately?
( , Thu 15 Aug 2013, 12:15)
Spimf says: I've always enjoyed listening to Pink Floyd, but lately I've noticed if my iPod plays any of their tracks, I skip them. I'm starting to realise I've gone off them. What have you gone off lately?
( , Thu 15 Aug 2013, 12:15)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
But they can post in the thread
I find my threads rapidly fill up with posts from theshitcunts 1337 HaXx0rz I've put on 2.0
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:49, 2 replies)
I find my threads rapidly fill up with posts from the
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:49, 2 replies)
Again, that's only because 2.0 is really poorly designed.
It was a bad idea in every conceivable way, and needed someone much more competent than whichever drooling fucktard they have maintaining the place currently.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:52, closed)
It was a bad idea in every conceivable way, and needed someone much more competent than whichever drooling fucktard they have maintaining the place currently.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:52, closed)
Well no arguments there - it's a bad idea, badly implemented
but that poor implementation negates all of the issues that the OP is complaining about.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:55, closed)
but that poor implementation negates all of the issues that the OP is complaining about.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:55, closed)
Not really, people shouldn't have to log out to see all the posts, that's completely arseways up from how every other messageboard on the internet works.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 16:02, closed)
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 16:02, closed)
If someone really has nothing better to do than abuse another user, it's not exactly difficult
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:56, closed)
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 15:56, closed)
so, your point is that ignore 2.0 doesn't go far enough?
i'm not following
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 16:22, closed)
i'm not following
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 16:22, closed)
My point is that edjogs was wrong when he said to BraynRot
"If the OP of this thread had you on ignore I would only be able to see BraynDedd's post and not your reply."
It's made even more nonsensical by the fact that Rot apparently has Dedd on 2.0 anyway, yet edjogs can see both their posts.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 16:37, closed)
"If the OP of this thread had you on ignore I would only be able to see BraynDedd's post and not your reply."
It's made even more nonsensical by the fact that Rot apparently has Dedd on 2.0 anyway, yet edjogs can see both their posts.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 16:37, closed)
i think the sentiment is that ignore 2.0 is shit
i'm sure we can all agree
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 16:38, closed)
i'm sure we can all agree
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 16:38, closed)
Rot hasn't got me on 2.0, it's a sockpuppet of someone who does, created purely to be upset with me, it seems.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 16:43, closed)
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 16:43, closed)
Damn right!
Start posting interesting or amusing stories, you useless cunt.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 18:48, closed)
Start posting interesting or amusing stories, you useless cunt.
( , Tue 20 Aug 2013, 18:48, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread