Irrational people
Freddie Woo tells us "I'm having to drive 500 miles to pick up my son from the ex's house because she won't let him take the train in case he gets off at the wrong station. He's 19 years old and has A-Levels and everything." - Tell us about illogical and irrational people who get on your nerves.
( , Thu 10 Oct 2013, 12:24)
Freddie Woo tells us "I'm having to drive 500 miles to pick up my son from the ex's house because she won't let him take the train in case he gets off at the wrong station. He's 19 years old and has A-Levels and everything." - Tell us about illogical and irrational people who get on your nerves.
( , Thu 10 Oct 2013, 12:24)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I used to vote regularly but don't any more.
I'm not sure the statement above about spoiled papers counting as a vote against is true....against who?
If all papers had a "none of the above" vote I'm sure turnouts would increase because not voting at the moment means they can say you weren't interested.
There isn't a party out there who have a clue what to do and a vote against would express this feeling.
Finally I reserve the right to bang on about how crap they are. Nobody asked my permission for them to bang on at me all the time.
( , Tue 15 Oct 2013, 17:48, 1 reply)
I'm not sure the statement above about spoiled papers counting as a vote against is true....against who?
If all papers had a "none of the above" vote I'm sure turnouts would increase because not voting at the moment means they can say you weren't interested.
There isn't a party out there who have a clue what to do and a vote against would express this feeling.
Finally I reserve the right to bang on about how crap they are. Nobody asked my permission for them to bang on at me all the time.
( , Tue 15 Oct 2013, 17:48, 1 reply)
What would happen if "none of the above" took the majority of the vote?
Would we shut down the state and default to anarchy?
( , Wed 16 Oct 2013, 8:18, closed)
Would we shut down the state and default to anarchy?
( , Wed 16 Oct 2013, 8:18, closed)
No, only the worst ones would be voted off but the remaining
ones would get the message that we can get rid of them if they are shit.
( , Wed 16 Oct 2013, 8:32, closed)
ones would get the message that we can get rid of them if they are shit.
( , Wed 16 Oct 2013, 8:32, closed)
All this would do is reinforce the main parties,
whilst ensuring that everyone else lost their deposit.
( , Wed 16 Oct 2013, 9:00, closed)
whilst ensuring that everyone else lost their deposit.
( , Wed 16 Oct 2013, 9:00, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread