Kids
Either you love 'em or you hate 'em. Or in the case of Fred West - both. Tell us your ankle-biter stories.
( , Thu 17 Apr 2008, 15:10)
Either you love 'em or you hate 'em. Or in the case of Fred West - both. Tell us your ankle-biter stories.
( , Thu 17 Apr 2008, 15:10)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
@CHCB and Enzyme
This is a very interesting one. I take CHCB's point entirely about the inherent stereotypes - maths/engineering/science is quite definitely not "a man's job," and I have to say my research group does a good job of bucking that trend.
As for Enzyme's point about stuff being hard-wired, this reminds me of an article which suggested that men are usually more inclined to try and be witty/funny in a social context as it's subconsciously a way of drawing female attention to themselves, in a "look at my tail-feathers/watch me bang my chest" sort of display. (It's quite credible if you watch the way male behaviour changes around women.)
By analogy: are men more inclined to go into (a) manual jobs or (b) science/engineering jobs because they're naturally inclined - however unconsciously - to display their strength or intelligence respectively, and therefore their suitability as a mate?
Or do we just have more of a tendency to tinker with stuff since we can't do much hunter-gathering these days?
( , Thu 24 Apr 2008, 11:25, Reply)
This is a very interesting one. I take CHCB's point entirely about the inherent stereotypes - maths/engineering/science is quite definitely not "a man's job," and I have to say my research group does a good job of bucking that trend.
As for Enzyme's point about stuff being hard-wired, this reminds me of an article which suggested that men are usually more inclined to try and be witty/funny in a social context as it's subconsciously a way of drawing female attention to themselves, in a "look at my tail-feathers/watch me bang my chest" sort of display. (It's quite credible if you watch the way male behaviour changes around women.)
By analogy: are men more inclined to go into (a) manual jobs or (b) science/engineering jobs because they're naturally inclined - however unconsciously - to display their strength or intelligence respectively, and therefore their suitability as a mate?
Or do we just have more of a tendency to tinker with stuff since we can't do much hunter-gathering these days?
( , Thu 24 Apr 2008, 11:25, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread