Dear dyslexics,
The unforgivably excessive permutations of terminology and phraseology in the English language undoubtedly appear impenetrable to you. Etymological derivations from multitudinous antediluvian sources must engender bewilderment; to this problematic repetoire, the inexorable advancement of time bequeaths neologisms - nascent, oft-impenetrable linguistic units frequently defying logical explanation. The vagaries of the language must be vexatious to your lexically-disadvantaged prefrontal cortexes; irrespective of your valiant and most strenuous effort, abject failure to comprehend is unfortunately inevitable. In respect of your likelihood of assimilating the information contained within this unnecessarily-abstruse missive, I can only conclude – you’re fucked.

yours,
-hp
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Thu 4 Mar 2010, 22:57, 12 replies)

This is quite possibly the best post I have ever read.

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Thu 4 Mar 2010, 23:00, closed)

Having a lot of dyslexic friends and family members
I can guarantee that they would understand this sentence just to prove you wrong. It's phrases like "Reading beading books bearing tears," that confuse.
(Sivvus trolley collision in the fruit aisle led to a jam, Thu 4 Mar 2010, 23:02, closed)

And rightly so.

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Thu 4 Mar 2010, 23:53, closed)

lololololol

( wotofco pissing in your swimming pool, Thu 4 Mar 2010, 23:56, closed)

Ahem
Cortices, not cortexes. It took me a while, but even you are not above Muphry's Law.
(StapMyVitals wouldn't mind a bit of that, Fri 5 Mar 2010, 0:34, closed)

Gah
I blame Pinot Noir. Although, to be fair, I can count the number of times I've previously been called upon to pluralise 'prefrontal cortex' on the fingers of one foot.

But grr, well spotted, etc. I dare say there are some others, for the uber-pedantic.

(ftr, wiktionary reckons both 'cortices' and 'cortexes' are acceptable... Granted, I'm cherry-picking that result, as most other places don't)
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Fri 5 Mar 2010, 0:53, closed)

unlikelihood
surely?
( Smash Monkey lowering the tone of the whole internet, Fri 5 Mar 2010, 0:44, closed)

haha, I suppose this was inevitable...
but.... but.... if one equates 'likelihood' with 'probability' - which one might well do, as they are largely interchangeable - then 'likelihood' could be assumed to run from 0 (impossible) to 1 (certain), encompassing all intermediary probabilities/likelinesses.
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Fri 5 Mar 2010, 1:03, closed)

I dont think im dyslexic
But I couldnt read it :(
(insomniac-surfer oh go on then, just this once, Fri 5 Mar 2010, 1:27, closed)

REKNAW UOY

(bad_advice QOTW survivor from the first trollocost!, Fri 5 Mar 2010, 2:12, closed)

Hahahaha!
You rotten cunt!

*Click*
( Chum Gnomesky Nom Chompsky, Fri 5 Mar 2010, 4:20, closed)

This is so full of win I'm going to have to go on a spree.

( Je suis un vagabond is an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob, Fri 5 Mar 2010, 8:30, closed)

Obfuscating diatribe
pulchritudinous (klic)
(justin(e), Fri 5 Mar 2010, 13:37, closed)

Bra-fucking-vo!
I take my hat off to you, Sir!
( CaptainCrackerjack live trout, slow motion, Sun 7 Mar 2010, 13:09, closed)

took me a while
but it was worth it! very funny sir, very funny indeed - have a Like This.
(The kneeling rifleman Is slowly getting there.., Sun 7 Mar 2010, 13:41, closed)