Drugs
Tell us your pharmaceutically-influenced anecdotes, legal or otherwise. We promise not to dob you in to The Man.
Thanks to sanityclause for the suggestion
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 13:30)
Tell us your pharmaceutically-influenced anecdotes, legal or otherwise. We promise not to dob you in to The Man.
Thanks to sanityclause for the suggestion
( , Thu 16 Sep 2010, 13:30)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
If it is
a while since ou have taken them you will also be very disapointed by the quality, it is at least 5 years since i have had anything even half decent.
Have the time i wonder why they even go to the effort of pressing them up. Since they got very cheap i.e a quid, they got very weak.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 12:10, 3 replies)
a while since ou have taken them you will also be very disapointed by the quality, it is at least 5 years since i have had anything even half decent.
Have the time i wonder why they even go to the effort of pressing them up. Since they got very cheap i.e a quid, they got very weak.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 12:10, 3 replies)
talking of which
Am I right in saying most dope nowadays is skunk?
When I were a lad, we used to get smooth brown or green lumps, that you'd heat with a lighter and crumble into a joint.
The last stuff I bought (which admittedly wasn't in the UK), was a sort of grassy crap, full of seeds and stalks, but pressed into a cube. Didn't need to heat it though. I assume it was skunk, but as far as smoking it goes, it wasn't very nice at all.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 12:16, closed)
Am I right in saying most dope nowadays is skunk?
When I were a lad, we used to get smooth brown or green lumps, that you'd heat with a lighter and crumble into a joint.
The last stuff I bought (which admittedly wasn't in the UK), was a sort of grassy crap, full of seeds and stalks, but pressed into a cube. Didn't need to heat it though. I assume it was skunk, but as far as smoking it goes, it wasn't very nice at all.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 12:16, closed)
Sounds like that was just compressed, rubbish grass
Skunk will usually be a few solid buds, on the green side of dry, maybe a bit compressed from packing.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 13:06, closed)
Skunk will usually be a few solid buds, on the green side of dry, maybe a bit compressed from packing.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 13:06, closed)
^this
fortunately that compressed grass isn't around much. it's worse than smoking solids in my book.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 13:22, closed)
fortunately that compressed grass isn't around much. it's worse than smoking solids in my book.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 13:22, closed)
Good point.
In my MASSIVE DRUGS-taking days I was always confounded by people in their mid-30s telling me how much better it was in their day.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 12:21, closed)
In my MASSIVE DRUGS-taking days I was always confounded by people in their mid-30s telling me how much better it was in their day.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 12:21, closed)
Blue speckled ones
contain actual mdma
tenner a pop
*touches nose*
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 12:41, closed)
contain actual mdma
tenner a pop
*touches nose*
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 12:41, closed)
Bollocks
The speckles mean nothing. MDMA is clear or milky white. Why would it give a pill blue speckles?
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 12:48, closed)
The speckles mean nothing. MDMA is clear or milky white. Why would it give a pill blue speckles?
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 12:48, closed)
error
isn't MDMA grey? If it's white it's got other shit in with it.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 13:23, closed)
isn't MDMA grey? If it's white it's got other shit in with it.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 13:23, closed)
Yes, I was clearly suggesting that the fact they have speckles means they've got mdma in
you fucking mong.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 13:44, closed)
you fucking mong.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 13:44, closed)
Speckles are not necessarily MDMA
Brown speckles usually indicated smack.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 15:08, closed)
Brown speckles usually indicated smack.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 15:08, closed)
Yeah, cause smack is so much cheaper than MDMA
and really effective when taken orally.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 15:12, closed)
and really effective when taken orally.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 15:12, closed)
It's less effective when taken orally yes
And it's nothing to do with cutting down the cost. It's to do with the mix.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 16:18, closed)
And it's nothing to do with cutting down the cost. It's to do with the mix.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 16:18, closed)
Smack has never been found in ecstasy tablets
it's a myth...speckles in pills indicate precisely nothing.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 16:23, closed)
it's a myth...speckles in pills indicate precisely nothing.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 16:23, closed)
I only buy pure speckles powder nowadays
keeps me going for months.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 17:51, closed)
keeps me going for months.
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 17:51, closed)
Hmmm
Snopes would seem to agree with you. Myth.
Reason I'd always assumed this was true was that at the height of my fuckheadedness I got a load of drug testing kits (the type you wee on) from a nurse friend so that I could test myself the day after indulging. They'd always show a strong reading for amphetamines, and quite often a strong reading for opiates too (and a load of other stuff as well - barbiturates etc - quite frightening really the mix of stuff you're exposed to from having consumed what you think is one type of drug). Obviously though a sample group of one is not exactly scientific.
( , Thu 23 Sep 2010, 10:49, closed)
Snopes would seem to agree with you. Myth.
Reason I'd always assumed this was true was that at the height of my fuckheadedness I got a load of drug testing kits (the type you wee on) from a nurse friend so that I could test myself the day after indulging. They'd always show a strong reading for amphetamines, and quite often a strong reading for opiates too (and a load of other stuff as well - barbiturates etc - quite frightening really the mix of stuff you're exposed to from having consumed what you think is one type of drug). Obviously though a sample group of one is not exactly scientific.
( , Thu 23 Sep 2010, 10:49, closed)
Actually
had one of these a month or two back, was good but nothing exceptional, certainly no better than early 2000's and as such resented paying a tenner for it.
Ha ha grumpy old man!
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 13:56, closed)
had one of these a month or two back, was good but nothing exceptional, certainly no better than early 2000's and as such resented paying a tenner for it.
Ha ha grumpy old man!
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 13:56, closed)
Didn't mind paying a tenner seeing as it worked
£20 back in my day...
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 14:03, closed)
£20 back in my day...
( , Wed 22 Sep 2010, 14:03, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread