That's libellous.
You might want to reconsider that post.
( stuj (^(^;;^)^) GO TEAM SPIDERS!(^(^;;^)^), Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:28, 1 reply)

I'm furiously reconsidering and I can't see anything wrong with it.

(Bazongaloid, Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:31, closed)

Well, there's the fact that evidence collection is a prerequisite for analysis, and there was no mention of the latter taking place at the scene. And then there's the bit where you don't seem to be able to tell the difference between "your" and "you're".
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:47, closed)

Rather than argue,
just pop your goggles on and enjoy the shit-flinging show.

It's actually been moderately funny how much of a froth most of them have worked themselves into with such limited stimuli.
(Misery McUglywife an attention seeking sociopathic fuckstain., Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:51, closed)

I'm not frothing, I'm asking genuine questions about this "true story" which casts serious doubt on it authenticity
You do realise that just because someone disagrees with you it doesn't mean they are upset or furious or any of those things. I just can't see why you have spent so long writing this story and yet made so many basic errors.
(Bazongaloid, Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:53, closed)

Your questions cast doubt on your literacy, nothing more.
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:56, closed)

One spelling error and i'm illiterate
That's quite amazing. And yet you understood exactly what I meant. Still, you have stopped attempting to answer the questions I posed and instead started making ad hominem attacks.

This casts you in an excellent light.
(Bazongaloid, Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:01, closed)

He didn't say you were illiterate
So shouldn't that also put your reading skills into question too?
(Dr Doctor Can't you see I'm burning burning?, Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:07, closed)

Hello, Weepy Puppet.

(alright alright, Mon 5 Aug 2013, 23:04, closed)

Alright, angry puppet

(Dr Doctor Can't you see I'm burning burning?, Tue 6 Aug 2013, 8:42, closed)

I do so love it when pricks moan about "ad hominem", like we're peer reviewing a paper in Nature or something, rather than bickering on the internet.

Tell me, are you unfamiliar with the site?
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:10, closed)

OH NOES MY SPELLING WAS INCORRECT!!!!!!
And let me write it once more to be very clear. If you are conducting an examination of a rape victim, it is not going to be done at their house with the suspect on the balcony. It will be done in a hospital. Which bit of that don't you get?
(Bazongaloid, Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:52, closed)

It's not that the spelling was incorrect - you actually spelled the word quite well, it was just the wrong word.

You realise that the forensic people might be there to examine the scene of the crime, rather than the person, right? I mean, they turned up to do that when some cunt broke into my car, so I reckon they might also do it for a rape.
( Happy Phantom has been to Hastings, Brighton, and Eastbourne too, Mon 5 Aug 2013, 12:55, closed)

I was actually really impressed by how many
fingerprints they got of our sliding doors a few years ago after our last break-in. Latex gloves are your friend.
(Misery McUglywife an attention seeking sociopathic fuckstain., Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:11, closed)

That actually sounds a bit wrong doesn't it?

(Misery McUglywife an attention seeking sociopathic fuckstain., Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:16, closed)

It really does.
It sounds a bit.....rapey.
( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Mon 5 Aug 2013, 13:16, closed)