If memory serves,
this is theft. I remember two cases, one where a guy put expensive shoes in a cheap shoebox in a shoe shop in order to have the cheaper barcode scanned, and the other where a guy put the price label from a cheap cut of meat onto an expensive cut in a supermarket, and they both got done for theft. Any resident jurists with a legal training more recent than 1997 care to confirm this?
( .Yeti., Sun 18 Sep 2011, 17:37, 1 reply)

Taking something from a shop,
without paying for it?

If that's not theft, then the riots were nothing more than an ill-tempered shopping spree.
( monster munch person, man, woman... camera... TV?, Sun 18 Sep 2011, 21:16, closed)

They did pay for it,
but their deception as to the true value of the goods vitiated their true and valuable consideration at the moment of payment. Much like you, really.
( .Yeti., Mon 19 Sep 2011, 8:45, closed)

Are you
propositioning me?
( monster munch person, man, woman... camera... TV?, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 19:38, closed)